Studying public relations as my
major has caused me to look at these situations from a PR perspective. This
case is especially interesting to look at because of the tactics, or rather the
lack of tactics, used to combat this major public relations crisis. Because
Miracle Mattress is a one-location family owned company, it is easily assumed
that there was little to no plan for a crisis situation like this one. The
company was ripped apart on social media destroying the small reputation it
might have held prior.
The ad was posted to the Miracle
Mattress Facebook page by the star of the commercial, Charisse Bonanno, just a
few days before the anniversary of 9/11. Charisse is the owner of Miracle Mattress’
daughter. Quickly after it’s initial post, it went viral. The American
population was disgusted by the ad’s tasteless offensive nature.
The first statement from Mike
Bonanno, owner of Miracle Mattress, came out on September 8 via Facebook. 7
short paragraphs in length, the statement offered a slight apology to those
offended by the ad but the majority of the statement pleaded his ignorance in
the matter. One part of the statement read, “the video was posted on Facebook
without my knowledge or approval from our corporate office in Huston.” I found
this to be a very bad move on his part. People don’t care that the CEO had no
knowledge of this commercial. They are looking for a major apology and a way to
make up for the hurt they have caused.
The second statement came out just
a day later announcing the closing of Miracle Mattress. The first line read,
“effective immediately, our Miracle Mattress store will be closed
indefinitely.” The language used in this next statement would prove to cause
even more of a backlash for the company once a later announcement was made of
their plans to reopen.
The first two efforts to calm the
outraged public over the distasteful commercial Miracle Mattress produced
proved ineffective. I would almost argue that the efforts made to relieve the
angry public only hurt the company further. However, in the last statement
seemed to hit at least a few of the angry commenters. In the comments below the
statement, people began taking sides. Tom Lewis commented on the September 16
statement and said, “you made a mistake, you owned up to it, you shut down over
a holiday weekend, you’re donating to a good cause, you apologized to the local
and greater community, and you’re training your staff. A truly appropriate
response. Well done.” This is exactly what you hope to hear from an outraged
public as a company that made a mistake.
The last aspect of this social
media case I want to touch on is the tactful use of a Miracle Mattress
supporter who lost her husband in the 9/11 attack. Lisa Patterson spoke to the
press about the people responsible saying, “I know that you’re (Mike) a good
man at heard, and that Charissse is a good person.” Using this widows statement
is the smartest thing you can do in this situation. Using and reusing this statement
will spark other to forgive and recognize the magnitude of the mistake, but the
equal sincere apology for the mistake.
Overall I think Miracle Mattress
could have done a better job from the beginning confronting the issue. It would
have been wise for them to bring in a communications specialist to deal with an
issue of this magnitude, which I do not believe they did. If they could have
attacked the issue the way they did a couple weeks later in the first public
statements, I think they would have avoided a lot of the backlash from people
commenting on social media. You can read more about the efforts to combat this
issue on the Miracle Mattress Facebook page here.
Sarah, you're article was written really well. The paragraphs and story really flowed well. My only critique is that to make sure you check your hot links before you publish your post, I couldn't get them to work. Other than that it was a great post.
ReplyDelete